Categories
Hope Hopeful Thoughts

Hopeful Thought for the Day: Atonement

Just as divine hospitality requires at least some violence to make it flourish, so also God’s love requires that he become angry when his love is violated. For God not to get angry when he is rejected by people made in his image (and redeemed in Christ) would demonstrate indifference, not love. When God steps into a world of injustice, he shows his love in particular ways. . . . Love, it seems, requires passionate anger toward anything that would endanger the relationship of love. . . . Hospitality bespeaks the very essence of God, while violence is merely one of the ways to safeguard or ensure the future of his hospitality when dealing with the humps and bumps of our lives. Divine violence, in other words, is a way in which God strives toward an eschatological situation of pure hospitality.

– Hans Boersma, Violence, Hospitality, and the Cross.

Categories
Hope Hopeful Thoughts

Hopeful Though for the Day

The death of Jesus on the cross is the centre of all Christian theology.  It is not the only theme of theology, but it is in effect the entry to its problems and answers on earth.  All Christian statements about God, about creation, about sin and death have their focal point in the crucified Christ.  Al Christian statements about history, about the church, about faith and sanctification, about the future and about hope stem from the crucified Christ. . . . [T]he centre is occupied not by ‘cross and resurrection’, but by the resurrection of the crucified Christ, which qualifies his death as something that has happened for us, and the cross of the risen Christ, which reveals and makes accessible to those who are dying his resurrection from the dead.

— Jurgen Moltmann, The Crucified God

Categories
Science and Religion

New Post on Biologos

I have a new guest post up on Biologos: “A ‘Historical’ Adam?” It is my very halting and preliminary attempt to sketch out a “middle ground” position on an issue in the faith-science conversation that can be very challenging for evangelicals.

Categories
Spirituality

That Other Soul Sort Narrative

On Scot McKnight’s Jesus Creed blog, we’ve been discussing Brian McLaren’s latest book, particularly Brian’s construction of what he calls the “soul sort” narrative. I have a post on that over at Jesus Creed.  Take a look.

Categories
Hopeful Thoughts

Hopeful Thought for the Day

Our “thought” for the day is an image. This is a picture I took of a 17th Century Spanish painting that hangs in the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York. BTW, walking through the Met’s Medieval and Renaissance Art collections can be a neat spiritual exercise because so much of the art from those periods focuses on Christ.

I appreciate this image because of its realism and power. It is painted on a large wooden panel and hangs high overhead in the museum. To me, it conveys the brutal reality of Christ’s passion, as well as the universality of Christ’s suffering. It’s size and scope, with the sagging, distended posture of Christ’s body, communicate to me that the weight of all the suffering in the world is falling onto the broken body of Jesus. At first blush, this seems a strange jumping-off point for “hopeful” thoughts. Take a moment, however, to allow this image to sink in as you return to our reading for the week in Colossians 2. How does the physicality of the cross communicate hope to you in the midst of your own suffering?

Categories
Hope

Reading on "Hope"

Our theme for this coming Sunday is Hope and the Cross. How did the cross, a symbol of shame, become a symbol of hope? We’ll discuss how various theories of the “atonement” – satisfaction, Christus Victor, and moral example — complement each other and offer hope against the power of sin.

As reading for this week, I’d like us to focus on Colossians 2. Take a few moments each day to read through this chapter of scripture. By way of some background on this chapter, the teachings that were troubling the Christians to whom Paul writes this letter probably were “Gnostic.” The Gnostics taught that Jesus was not really God incarnate, because they believed physical matter was essentially evil. They taught that Jesus’ body was a sort of illusion or phantom and that his death on the cross therefore was in a sense not “real.” They further taught that only a few people with secret, insider knowledge, usually involving mystical signs or words, would be saved, and that they were in a position to pass along that secret knowledge, which they had learned privately from Jesus. Think a bit about how this background informs the concepts of “fullness,” “headship,” and “life” that Paul uses in this chapter.

Another interesting bit of background is Paul’s use of the terms “power” and “authority.” This also relates to his refutation of the Gnostics, who claimed to possess special power derived from their insider knowledge. It is also a broader reference to the eschatological themes in Paul’s theology and elsewhere in the New Testament. A first century reader familiar with Jewish apocalyptic literature would recognize a political reference in Paul’s use of these terms. The Roman powers claimed the very authority of the gods. Paul’s references to “power” and “authority” here, then, relate to the entire range of political-spiritual-social forces that could threaten to disrupt the hope of God’s people.

After you read this passage each day, take a little time to meditate (think intently and prayerfully upon) these phrases that appear in the chapter:

“fullness in Christ”

“Christ, who is the head over every power and authority”

“alive with Christ”

“disarmed”

“triumphing over them by the cross.”

As you read, pray, and meditate on these scriptures, what does the Holy Spirit convey to you about the nature of the cross of Christ in relation to “hope?”

Categories
Hopeful Thoughts

Hopeful Thought for the Day

As long as we see Christian hope in terms of “going to heaven,” of a salvation that is essentially away from this world, the two questions are bound to appear as unrelated.  Indeed, some insist angrily that to ask the second one at all is to ignore the first one, which is the really important one.  This in turn makes some others get angry when people talk of resurrection, as if this might draw attention away from the really important and pressing matters of contemporary social concern.  But the Christian hope is for God’s new creation, for “new heavens and the new earth,” and if that hope has already come to life in Jesus of Nazareth, then there is every reason to join the two questions together.  And if that is so, we find that answering the one is also answering the other.  I find that to many — not least, many Christians — all this comes as a surprise:  both that the Christian hope is surprisingly different from what they had assumed and that this same hope offers a coherent and energizing basis for work in today’s world.

N.T. Wright, Surprised by Hope:  Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church

Categories
Biblical Studies

The End of Reformed Evangelical Biblical Scholarship

On Euangelion, Mike Bird writes about the “end” of Reformed evangelical Biblical scholarship.  Mike is keen observer, and this is a sobering post.  For those who aren’t up on these things, the venerable Bruce Waltke resigned from Reformed Theological Seminary after a dust-up over his video on faith and science was posted on BioLogos (the video has since been removed).  In Mike Bird’s words, the “trend is what I simply have to call a Fundamentalist Resurgence in what were once historical Evangelical Denominations and Institutions.”

Mike is absolutely right, I think, in this assessment:  “The job of Christian professors is not to tell the laity what they want to hear (whether that’s on healthcare or science or Bible versions), but to assist students, pastors, and churches to have a “faith seeking understanding” and to help bridge the academy and church divide.”

Unfortunately, as Mike notes, in some institutions it seems that the only approach to Biblical scholarship involves “bowing before Systematic and Historical Theologians and allowing them to dictate the proper relationship of Ancient Near Eastern literature to the Old Testament, to determine the limitations of Science for explaining Creation narratives, to establish the proper meaning of Semitic and oriental languages, to legislate the sources and authorship and date of all Old Testament writings, and to state the proper significance of archaeological evidence relating to biblical places and persons.”

Mike asks, rhetorically and literally:   “who wants to do that?”

Categories
Spirituality

Blogging Since 2004

I just realized that I have been blogging here at Through a Glass Darkly since at least 2004.  I say “at least” because my archives don’t seem to have my very first-ever blog post, which I remember vividly.  Wow.  Six years, I’ve been blogging about theology and culture.

Categories
Hopeful Thoughts

Hopeful Thought for the Day

From St. Isaac of Syria, a Christian monk who lived in the 7th Century:

No one has understanding if he is not humble, and he who lacks humility is devoid of understanding.

No one is humble if he is not at peace, and he who is not at peace is not humble.  And no one is at peace without rejoicing.

In all the paths on which people journey in this world they will find no peace until they draw near to the hope which is in God.

The heart finds no peace from toil and from stumbling-blocks until it is brought close to hope — which makes it peaceful and pours joy into it.

This is what the venerable and holy lips of our Lord said:  ‘Come unto me all who are weary and heave laden, and I will give you rest.’

Draw near, he says, to hope in me; desist from the many ways and you will find rest from labor and fear.