Great post by Darrell Falk on the work of BioLogos, which I think applies equally to any effort to renew the evangelical mind.
Categories
On the way in to work this morning, I heard an interview on BBC Newshour that included Jordan Sekulow, Deputy Director of Public Affairs at the American Center for Law and Justice. The ACLJ has been a leading voice of the religious right concerning the so-called “Ground Zero Mosque.” The presenter asked Sekulow whether the plans for the muslim cultural center near ground zero is a religious liberty issue. Sekulow dodged the question in what seems to me a bizarre fashion: he responded that while we have great religious liberties in the United States, this implies great responsibilities for religious organizations. The implication was that, if you’re Muslim and you want the freedom to build a cultural center, you’d better not build it in an otherwise lawful location that really upsets some people.
The last time I checked, if religious liberty means anything, it means the freedom to do and say otherwise lawful things that some people will find uncomfortable or even infuriating. The “responsibility” implied by religious liberty is not the “responsibility” to dilute a religious message or buckle under the pressure of fear and prejudice.
The presenter then asked Sekulow whether the same reasoning applies to the plans of a Florida church to hold a Qur’an burning on September 11. Sekulow dodged again. This is an issue that has been blown out of proportion by “the media,” he explained. It is one small church of only 50 people and doesn’t represent the feelings of most Christians. What’s good for the goose apparently isn’t good for the gander.
The truth is that the stock “blame the media” response is disingenuous. There is a horrible fear and ignorance about Islam in many corners of evangelicalism in the United States. It extends beyond one small crazy little church. I once witnessed a Sunday morning sermon in a 2000-member church, which was part of a national tour by prominent evangelical leader Norman Geisler, about why Islam is a violent religion that must be opposed, including militarily (a deputy of Geisler preached at the service I attended, but Geisler himself preached at other services). The sermon ended with a Powerpoint slide juxtaposing Osama bin Laden and Mother Theresa. Osama is what you get with Islam, the preacher said, and Mother Theresa is what you get with Christianity. (Nevermind that the Senior Pastor of this particular church thought most Catholics were trying to earn salvation by works and therefore were heading for Hell…). People ate it up. I got in lots of trouble with the church leadership for complaining.
Lest my critics jump all over me, I am not suggesting that all or even most evangelicals hate Muslims. The generally conservative evangelical church I now attend would never, never sponsor such outrageous trash as that Geisler Powerpoint show. There are prominent evangelicals involved with groups like the Institute for Global Engagement, which is doing brilliant work on religious freedom and respect between Christians and Muslims. I am an evangelical, and I don’t hate Muslims. But at the same time, ignorance and fear are certainly not confined to a few radical little fundamentalist churches. It is a cancer that, in my view, is part of a disease of reactionary posturing that has afflicted us since at least the fundamentalist-modernist controversy of the early twentieth century.
Hypocrisy is a strong word. Sometimes it needs to be said.
Another good video in the continuing conversation with N.T. Wright.
Categories
What is a Theologian
A good summary by Scot McKnight of Alister McGrath’s latest book. This is a great summary of what I’d like to be.
Inside the lecture room we make a distinction between biblical scholars and theologians. The former are either Old Testament or New Testament, and the latter specialize in systems of thought, whether they focus on telling us what theologians teach (Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Barth) or what is to be taught (systematics).
But outside those walls, and particularly in the local church, that distinction vanishes quickly when folks want wisdom or answers to questions. They don’t care if I’m a New Testament guy, they might ask me about Genesis or about Jonathan Edwards. Sometimes, frankly, Christians disparage the academic life of a theologian; they can put-down those who have intellectual pursuits; they can even get into the “real life” vs. the “speculative” stuff. This is not particularly helpful to anyone, and so we need to chase down a better way.
What the Church wants from specialists is wisdom, and this brings me to something Alister McGrath recently wrote about in his new book in Alister McGrath’s newest book, The Passionate Intellect: Christian Faith and the Discipleship of the Mind
.
He discusses what theologians– and I post a pic to the right of Miroslav Volf, one of America’s premier theologians — can provide for the church under four categories, but before I get there I wonder what role a theologian plays in your local church? Does your church have a “theologian”? What if you have questions … to whom do you go? What advice do you have for theologians? Which theologians do you think are really of help to the church today?
McGrath sees four components of the professional theologian’s contribution to the life of the church, and in this neither he nor I are diminishing the theological role of the pastor – and in some ways the pastor as theologian plays the same role as the professional theologian:
First, the theologian can be a resource person for the local church. Every church and every pastor has questions; often the pastor is in communication with a college professor, a seminary professor or even an author who happens to know a subject.
Second, the theologian can be an interpreter of the Christian tradition for the local church. Just recently I got a note from a pastor friend who got a letter from a parishioner who took her to task for something she said, and sent me the note — not for gossip but for genuine help with a perplexing set of inquiries. I was able to sort through some of the letter because I had been there and knew the subject and I made a few suggestions. But the whole issue came down to the letter writer having a substantially different theology than the pastor. Theologians can help here, and they can often bring the history of theology to bear on a particular issue.
Third, a theologian can be an interpreter of the Christian tradition to those outside the church. We often call these “public intellectuals” today, but think about the number of times that Christian thinkers are called into play when questions arise, and what I’m seeing in the age of the internet is the presence of theologians now on the internet and on cable TV — though sometimes the theologian is one person removed for a pastor is the one who is called into play (and the pastor has been in touch with some theologian). We needed theologians for the DaVinci Code fiasco.
Fourth, a theologian is a fellow traveler with and within the community of faith. Augustine and JI Packer are theologians who were (and are) involved in the local church — theologizing and pastoring and mentoring. Yes, some theologians seem not to care about the local church but far more care and care deeply. What happens in the community often shapes what the theologian cares about and thinks about and writes about.
Categories
Prophetic Lament
Here’s a promo video for a course I’m teaching this fall on Prophetic Lament. All the texts are from Lamentations.
Photo credits: http://www.flickriver.com/photos/hadsie/3289716114/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/claudiotesta/3161550914/in/pool-984968@N22/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/demonbaby/2217147743/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/demonbaby/2088052813/
From The Onion: Man Already Knows Everything He Needs to Know About Muslims
Categories
How Many of These…
does your team have?
Categories
Bloomberg on the Mosque
From Mayor Bloomberg’s recent Iftar dinner speech:
if we say that a mosque and community center should not be built near the perimeter of the World Trade Center site, we would compromise our commitment to fighting terror with freedom.
We would undercut the values and principles that so many heroes died protecting. We would feed the false impressions that some Americans have about Muslims. We would send a signal around the world that Muslim Americans may be equal in the eyes of the law, but separate in the eyes of their countrymen. And we would hand a valuable propaganda tool to terrorist recruiters, who spread the fallacy that America is at war with Islam.
Exactly.