I’ve you’ve ever read legal scholarship — heaven help you — you’ll know that law review articles are heavily laden with footnotes. Nearly every sentence requires a footnote, and the collective verbiage of the footnotes sometimes outweighs the article’s main body. Anyway, I stumbled across this today, in Rosemary J. Coombe, Objects of Property and Subjects of Politics: Intellectual Property Laws and Democratic Dialogue, 69 Tex. L. Rev. 1853 (1991), a clever postmodern critique of the notion of “authorship” in copyright law:
“I will also cease to cite endless reerences in incessant footnotes,[FN22] as if an abundance of small typeface enabled us to ‘speak in the name of the real.'[FN23]
[FN 22] Well, at least I’ll try.
[FN 23] I have appropriated this phrase from Paul Stoller, who borrowed it from Ivan Brady, who appropriated it from Michel de Certeau, who discusing reading and writing as textual poaching in “The Practice of Everyday Life.”