There’s an interesting article in this month’s First Things by theologian R.R. Reno titled “Theolgy’s Continental Captivity.” Reno reviews a systematic theology text by Catholic theologian Thomas Guarino, which takes up the problem of non-foundationalist theology. Reno makes a compelling distinction, I think, between non-foundationalist ontology and non-foundationalist epistemology.
Non-foundationalist ontology is the sort of non-foundationalism held by the Continental postmodern philosophers. When many of us hear the term “postmodernism,” this is what we conjure. This is the view that there is no “Truth,” but rather there are only linguistic constructs. Reno correctly argues that this sort of non-foundationalism is inimical to Christian notions of Truth.
As Christians, we are ontological foundationalists. We believe there is such a thing as Reality outside our linguistic and social constructs, and that Reality ultimately is grounded in God. Therefore, we believe there is such a thing as “objective” Truth.
There is a difference, however, between the fact of Reality and the extent to which we as human beings can perceive, comprehend and make true statements about Reality. Here, Reno refers helpfully to W.V. Quine.